

Is Tom Cruise taller than Mark Wahlberg?
No. Mark Wahlberg is taller than Tom Cruise by 3 in (7.8 cm).
Tom Cruise: shorter than about 75 in 100 US men. Mark Wahlberg: taller than about 63 in 100 US men.
In heels or lifts?
Pick how much the shoes raise each person. A heel raises you by less than its own height, because the ball of the foot sits lower than the heel, so a height measured in the shoes is best.
Both heights are published listings, not a side-by-side measurement, so treat the gap as approximate.
Where these heights come from
Tom Cruise is commonly listed at 5 ft 7 in (170 cm). See all of Tom Cruise’s listed heights.
Mark Wahlberg is commonly listed at 5 ft 10 in (177.8 cm). See all of Mark Wahlberg’s listed heights.
Photos: Tom Cruise by Kevin Paul, CC BY 4.0; Mark Wahlberg by U.S. Marine Corps photo by Sgt. Jorge A. Rosales, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons, cropped.
More comparisons
Tom Cruise
- Tom Cruise vs Cillian Murphy: the same listed height, 5 ft 7 in.
- Tom Cruise vs Al Pacino: Tom Cruise is taller than Al Pacino by 1 in (2.4 cm).
- Tom Cruise vs Tom Holland: Tom Holland is taller than Tom Cruise by 1 in (3 cm).
Mark Wahlberg
- Mark Wahlberg vs Noah Schnapp: Mark Wahlberg is taller than Noah Schnapp by 1 in (2.5 cm).
- Mark Wahlberg vs Tom Holland: Mark Wahlberg is taller than Tom Holland by 2 in (4.8 cm).
- Mark Wahlberg vs Zac Efron: Mark Wahlberg is taller than Zac Efron by 2 in (5.1 cm).
Cite this page
| APA | Heightvs. (2026, October 17). Is Tom Cruise taller than Mark Wahlberg? No, 3 in shorter. https://heightvs.com/compare/tom-cruise-vs-mark-wahlberg |
|---|---|
| MLA | “Is Tom Cruise Taller Than Mark Wahlberg? No, 3 in Shorter.” Heightvs, 17 Oct. 2026, heightvs.com/compare/tom-cruise-vs-mark-wahlberg. |
| Chicago | “Is Tom Cruise Taller Than Mark Wahlberg? No, 3 in Shorter.” Heightvs. Last modified October 17, 2026. https://heightvs.com/compare/tom-cruise-vs-mark-wahlberg. |
| Link | <a href="https://heightvs.com/compare/tom-cruise-vs-mark-wahlberg">Is Tom Cruise taller than Mark Wahlberg? No, 3 in shorter (Heightvs)</a> |